SpaceX’s Starship program’s recurrent explosions suggest that it is the worst space startup; so, a careful examination of its test flight data, the type of these failures are, and a comparison with other space startups is essential.
SpaceX has embraced an iterative design and testing strategy, which frequently yields failures before yielding innovations. Though these setbacks have proved expensive, they fit the company’s larger goal of advancing space exploration.
The Starship program has had several test flights as of March 7, 2025, each with varying results that support its path of development.
While some have shown great progress, others have ended in ruin. Examining the background of these events, the logic underlying them, and SpaceX’s relative performance to its rivals will help us determine whether these shortcomings support designating SpaceX as the worst space company.
Test Flight Record of The Starship Program
First April 20, 2023 Integrated Flight Test
First combined flight tests for the Starship program were Ship 24 and Booster 7. This test sought to show if the Starship-Super Heavy system could reach orbit and attain stage separation.
Engine problems during ascent, however, resulted in a loss of control and the flight termination system (FTS) was set off, therefore destroying the vehicle before stage separation.
Although substantial public mistrust resulted from this setback, given SpaceX’s testing approach it was not surprising.
Especially in regard to reinforcing engine dependability and flight control systems, the corporation collected vital information to enhance the design and engineering of next prototypes.
Nov. 18, 2023 Second Test Flight
By reaching stage separation—a crucial benchmark missing from the previous test—the second test flight indicated development.
But engine problems in the booster’s return phase caused an uncontrollably steep descent and explosion. Still, a major advance was the capacity to effectively segregate the stages.
Later on, a major component of reusability efforts, the test also helped engineers perfect the Mechazilla capturing mechanism for the rocket.
Third Flight: March 14, 2024
Since the third test flight completed in-space and attained orbital speed, it was the most successful one thus far. Sadly, re-entry lost communication, so the vehicle lost as well.
Though the effort failed, the fact that Starship made orbit signaled a program turning point.
By means of telemetry data analysis, engineers sought to identify the source of the communication loss, therefore enabling their refinement of Starship’s heat shield and communication systems for further missions.
Flight Fourth: June 6, 2024
Building on past accomplishments, the fourth test flight landed the booster softly in the ocean and executed a controlled splashdown of the Starship vehicle upon atmospheric re-entry.
This test confirmed notable improvement in booster recovery and re-entry survivability, therefore supporting SpaceX’s long-term objective of making Starship completely reusable.
The enhancements in landing control systems and thermal protection prepare the ground for even more audacious attempts in next flights.
October 13, 2024 – Fifth Test Flight
The most innovative success occurred maybe during the fifth test flight when the mechazilla tower arms effectively caught the Super Heavy booster mid-air.
For SpaceX, this was a pivotal turning point since it was the first effective launch tower booster recovery attempt.
This success was a big step in enabling Starship to be a totally reusable system, therefore drastically lowering the space travel cost.
Still, Starship itself has difficulties reusability, which calls for more improvements notwithstanding this triumph.
Flight Seventh: January 16, 2025
But the seventh test flight was cut short when the Starship vehicle lost touch and exploded over the Caribbean. The distribution of the trash generated disturbances in the area, which resulted in occasional flight deviations.
Although this failure generated safety issues, SpaceX kept underlining that such events are inevitable during the learning process for next-generation space vehicles.
The “Fail-Fast” Method: Ignite Innovation
Operating under a “fail-fast” mindset, SpaceX welcomes failure as a tool for fast data collecting, design improvement, and acceleration of development.
SpaceX does regular test flights to evaluate real-world performance, unlike conventional aerospace firms which depend on extensive ground testing before launch.
The Falcon 9, which developed from early failures into the most dependable reusable rocket in the market, was made successful in great part by this approach.
SpaceX also wants to use this method on Starship, seeing every test flight as a stepping stone toward complete reusability and deep-space capability.
With each Starship test flight projected to cost between $100 million and $200 million, the financial expenses of these setbacks are significant.
Long term, meanwhile, the aim is to create a completely reusable spaceship capable of drastically lowering launch expenses and enabling human colonization of Mars.
Unlike Other Space Startups: SpaceX
SpaceX has had difficulties, but other space companies have had their own.
blue Origin
Though work has been slower than expected, Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin has been developing the New Glenn rocket.
The company has had trouble with first-stage booster landings, and even with recent missions, it has not shown the quick iterative speed of SpaceX.
In an attempt to more successfully compete in the space sector, Blue Origin has also seen internal reorganization including management changes and layoffs.
Radio Lab
Though it runs on a different scale, Rocket Lab—known for its Electron rocket—has launched several missions with success.
Whereas SpaceX emphasizes heavy-lift rockets and interplanetary missions, Rocket Lab concentrates in small to medium payloads.
Although Rocket Lab has shown constant success, it has not yet tried the bold technological jumps SpaceX has sought with Starship.
Among space startups, is SpaceX the “worst”?
Calling SpaceX the worst space startup based just on its Starship failures ignores the larger background of its achievements.
Though expensive, the company’s iterative testing approach has shown success in the Falcon 9 and Starlink constellation development.
Given Starship’s goal of building a totally reusable spacecraft able for deep-space travel, mistakes are certain. Still, these challenges are necessary to realize the long-term goal of reasonably priced, environmentally friendly space flight.
SpaceX is the most ambitious and creative among other space entrepreneurs, ready to take measured risks to expand the frontiers of space research.
Stay Connected and Share Your Stories
For all those inspired by stories of resilience and ambition, follow us on X/Twitter and on Instagram . For those with untold stories that you would love to share, please send them to contact@thephilox.com
