Sadhguru Shyam Meera Singh
Shyam Meera Singh, a writer and YouTuber, has become a brave voice challenging the untouchable aura around Jaggi Vasudev, often known as Sadhguru, and his Isha Foundation in an era when powerful people often escape responsibility.
Singh has exposed serious claims of sexual harassment, rape, and child exploitation inside the vast grounds of Sadhguru’s ashram in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, via a sequence of striking postings on X between February 25 and 27, 2025.
His careful records and readiness to face a spiritual behemoth like Sadhguru merit not only respect but also broad acceptance for their ability to inspire justice and change. This essay explores Singh’s claims, praises his tenacity, and looks at the historical difficulties that have dogged Sadhguru and his group.
A Bold Exposé Based on Data
Based on what Shyam Meera Singh says are hacked official emails from the Isha Foundation and thorough explanations of certain events, his postings on X are a clarion call for responsibility.
Directly appealing to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, his initial post on February 25 calls for an inquiry on what Singh describes as “mass sexual harassment” at Sadhguru’s ashram. To support his assertions rather than merely sensationalizing them, he offers to help compile witnesses and evidence, therefore proving his point of view. It is admirable that a journalist would be proactive since it shows their obligation to not only document but also help justice.
In a later post on February 27, Singh goes into more detail using a four-point analysis of claimed misbehavior inside the Isha Foundation The first point is especially horrifying: an 8-year-old girl allegedly sexually harassed on several times by a physical training (PT) teacher at an Isha school. Singh claims the victim brought up this problem straight with Sadhguru during a session, but nothing was done. He further points out that the offender is free since the Coimbatore police neglected to document a FIR even after the victim complained on an NRI portal. If confirmed, this allegation indicates to a catastrophic breakdown of supervision inside the ashram and a possible cover-up by its leadership—a charge Singh boldly charges against a man revered by millions.
The second incidence concerns a Delhi woman reportedly raped by a fellow ashram visitor; a FIR was registered in Saket but no Coimbatore police action was taken upon case transfer. Singh notes that the woman withdrew her case and charges Sadhguru of inactivity, therefore enabling the accused to walk free.
In the third example, Singh claims that Sadhguru shielded the minor lad harassed by a “elite” Isha student, who is still enrolled in the ashram.
Singh also mentions stolen emails implying that small girls were asked to take part in initiation rites (Diksha), a practice allegedly carried out against parental permission and despite the girls’ discomfort. Bare-chested He charges Sadhguru directly as the single guru of the ashram, a startling allegation against a man usually sheltered by his spiritual posture.
It is quite amazing how brave Singh is in calling Sadhguru, a person with a worldwide following and under sponsorship of powerful leaders including India’s Home Minister Amit Shah.
His postings are more than just rants; they are a methodical critique backed by references to particular cases and records, which he says he will go into great length in a video exposé. This meticulous technique increases his credibility and emphasizes his will to hold a strong institution responsible despite certain reaction from Sadhguru’s ardent supporters.
Respect for Shyam Meera Singh’s Fight Against Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation is no small achievement. Comprising millions of volunteers, a vast campus in Coimbatore, and a name strengthened by well-known sponsors, the company is a powerhouse. Singh’s eagerness to question this monster shows a unique journalistic honesty, particularly in a time where media frequently treads around powerful people.
His postings on X show a rejection to be intimidated by the might of the ashram or the possible social and legal consequences of his accusations. Given the past trend of mistrust of whistleblowers aiming at spiritual leaders in India, this determination is very motivating.
Singh’s approach gains moral weight also from his emphasis on the victims—especially vulnerable youngsters. By elevating their stories, he turns the emphasis from the alleged misery inside Sadhguru’s ashram to his charm. His eagerness to help authorities gather evidence sharpens his position from observer to advocate, a change worthy of praise. In a nation where victims of sexual violence may suffer institutional lethargy and shame, Singh’s public voice could inspire others to speak out, therefore possibly untangling a more extensive network of wrongdoing.
Shadowed Past of Sadhguru: A History of Controversies
Singh’s claims are not isolated; they build on a distressing past of scandals connected to Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation. One of the first and most recurring charges goes back to 1997, when the wife of Sadhguru, Vijji, passed away at the ashram under unexplained events.
Officially noted as occurring during a meditation condition known as “mahasamadhi,” her father filed a police complaint alleging foul play, saying Sadhguru played a part in her death. Although the matter was finally handled, it raised still unresolved issues regarding responsibility and openness in the ashram that reflect Singh’s present claims.
The Isha Foundation has been accused over years of land invasion, mostly in Tamil Nadu’s Vellingiri Hills, where tribal people have alleged the ashram unlawfully taken over their traditional territory.
Environmentalists have also attacked Sadhguru for building the enormous Adiyogi monument and other constructions without appropriate licenses, but the organization has regularly disputed these allegations citing official approvals. A Tamil Nadu police report filed to the Supreme Court in 2024 shows multiple cases against the Isha Foundation over 15 years including missing persons, suicides, and a charge of sexual assault transferred from Delhi.
The study generated questions over insufficient internal systems, such a non-functional Internal Complaints Committee under the POSH Act, even while it exonerated the ashram of claims of illegal incarceration under a habeas corpus petition.
Parents and former employees also claimed in October 2024 sexual abuse of children in Isha-run schools, notably Isha Home School. These assertions, which come from sites like The Hindu and The South First, reflect Singh’s charges and point to a pattern of structural problems.
Although the foundation has usually discounted such accusations as smear operations by critics, the frequency of these claims—from land conflicts to personal misbehavior— gives validity to Singh’s demand for an exhaustive inquiry.
The Way Ahead: Deflection or Justice?
Singh’s postings conclude in a harsh critique of the Indian legal system, stating that Sadhguru stays free and even organizes events with the Home Minister while these accusations remain unanswered.
This juxtaposition of affluence and impunity is a strong point that emphasizes the difference between the public view of the ashram and the sinister undercurrents Singh tries to reveal. His work questions not only Sadhguru but also the larger ecosystem preserving influential people, a fight relevant to everyone disappointed by unbridled power.
Singh’s assertions, however, depend on the validity of the disclosed emails and the proof he pledges to offer. Critics might contend that his claims demand thorough evidence outside of social media posts and recordings, a reasonable argument highlighting the need of an official investigation.
Still, his catalyst—forcing a public reckoning with difficult issues—is priceless. Should Tamil Nadu officials answer his call, as he exhorts CM Stalin to do, the inquiry might either confirm his position or highlight flaws in his story.
In any case, Singh’s courage in starting this dialogue is a victory of personal will versus institutional force.
Finally, Shyam Meera Singh’s opposition to Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation is evidence of the ability of media to challenge authority directly. The public and the government should give his thorough accusations—based on particular events and claimed documented evidence—great thought.
Singh has set a flame that might shine light on sinister aspects of a venerated institution by going back over Sadhguru’s contentious past and elevating present charges. Armed with little more than truth and perseverance, he gets not only respect but also appreciation as a lone warrior fighting a Goliath.
