Justice Markandey Katju responds to Mahua Moitra’s statement that critiques of former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud are surfacing only after he retired. Katju describes his ongoing criticism during the tenure of Chandrachud on judgments such as Ayodhya verdict and the Gyanvapi mosque case wherein he argues, career motives overtook the integrity of the judiciary. Katju is further highlighting Chandrachud’s controversial public appearances and suo motu matters and countering Moitra with evidence of his long-continuing opposition. Thereby, this article can shine light on the many complex issues of judicial accountability and political discourse over the tenure of Chandrachud.