Heartbreak and Controversy: Nishant Dev’s Olympic Journey
Indian boxer Nishant Dev’s debut Olympic campaign in Paris ended in heartbreak on August 3, 2024. Competing in the men’s 71kg category, Nishant was just one win away from securing a medal for India. However, his journey was cut short in the quarterfinals after a controversial split verdict defeat to Mexico’s Marco Verde Alvarez. The 23-year-old world championship bronze medallist, who had previously defeated Alvarez in the 2021 World Championships, faced a controversial decision that many claim robbed him of a well-deserved Olympic medal.
A Promising Start
Nishant started the quarterfinal bout with confidence and dominance. He won the opening round with ease, showcasing his skill and control. Nishant’s powerful jab hooks and aggressive style seemed to put him in a favorable position. However, despite his apparent superiority in the first two rounds, the judges’ decisions shocked everyone.
Controversial Scoring
In the second round, despite Nishant landing significant punches and maintaining control, the judges surprisingly sided with Alvarez, putting him 3-2 ahead. This unexpected decision raised eyebrows and led to claims of unfair scoring. From the naked eye, Nishant looked more dominant, and many believed he had clearly won the first two rounds.
Claims of Cheating Surface
The controversial scoring did not go unnoticed. Former Olympic bronze medallist Vijender Singh and actor Randeep Hooda were among those who questioned the integrity of the scoring system. Vijender praised Nishant for his valiant effort and expressed confusion over the scoring. “I don’t know what’s the scoring system, but I think very close fight..he played so well..koi na bhai #NishantDev,” Vijender wrote on social media.
Randeep Hooda also voiced his frustration, stating, “Nishant had won it. What’s this scoring? Robbed of the medal but won hearts. Sad!! Many more to go chore!!” Their reactions reflect the sentiment of many who watched the bout and believed Nishant was unfairly judged.
The Turning Point
In the third round, the judges unanimously favored Alvarez, awarding him five points. Nishant, on the other hand, received nine points from the judges. This decision cemented Alvarez’s victory, despite Nishant’s continued intensity and effort. The scoring in the third round left many in disbelief, as it appeared inconsistent with Nishant’s performance in the ring.
The Aftermath
Nishant’s quarterfinal exit was a bitter pill to swallow, especially considering his hard-fought journey to the final eight. He had previously secured a spot in the quarterfinals with a split decision victory over Ecuador’s Jose Rodriguez. However, the controversial decision in his bout against Alvarez overshadowed his achievements and left a sense of injustice.
Nishant Dev’s Olympic journey in Paris ended amid controversy and claims of unfair scoring. Despite his impressive performance and clear dominance in the first two rounds, the judges’ decisions favored his opponent, leading to a split verdict defeat.
The reactions from former athletes and fans highlight the perceived injustice and call for a review of the scoring system. Nishant’s story is a testament to his talent and determination, and although he did not secure a medal, he won the hearts of many with his courageous effort.
Sources
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/paris-olympics-2024/indiaparis/whats-this-scoring-robbed-of-the-medal-boxer-nishant-devs-quarter-final-exit-sparks-scoring-system-debate-at-paris-olympics/articleshow/112259967.cms
https://www.desimartini.com/events/nishant-dev-robbed-of-a-medal-indian-fans-demand-accountability-from-paris-2024-blame-judges-and-demand-transparency/2ebb39515f974/
https://sports.ndtv.com/olympics-2024/paris-olympics-2024-live-updates-manu-bhaker-nishant-dev-olympic-games-paris-2024-day-8-latest-updates-6252975
