Chinese DeepSeek Worst in the AI Race Hindered by Inaccuracies, English Grammar Mistakes, and Privacy Worries

In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence, China has made significant strides in developing competitive AI models. One such initiative is DeepSeek, an AI model designed to rival leading global platforms like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

DeepSeek has gained attention for its strong performance in Chinese language processing, making it a promising tool for native speakers. However, despite its strengths, the model faces several critical challenges that limit its global acceptance.

These include issues of accuracy and reliability, to weaker performance in English, not understanding complex commands, and severe privacy concerns.

As AI assumes a more critical role in the professional and academic world, the limitations of DeepSeek pose a significant barrier to its success in the international market.

This article discusses these challenges in depth by comparing the performance of DeepSeek with that of its competitors and analyzing the potential future improvements.

Reliability problems and accuracy concerns

A second major concern surrounding DeepSeek is about its somewhat inconsistent accuracy of logical reasoning abilities.

The researchers behind AI have tried benchmark tests by testing the capabilities of the model in various different fields, be it mathematics or coding or other problem-solving ability.

DeepSeek-R1 performs very well when it comes to mathematics, garnering 97.3% on the benchmark MATH-500, whereas it is terrible at nuanced reasonings.

For instance, on questions that require contextual meaning, DeepSeek mostly miswords questions or provides false answers. Sometimes, it produces inappropriate or fallacious reasoning, therefore cannot be used for professional purposes or in institutions of learning.

It does have a huge concern with hallucination rate. Hallucination rate is a simple term, which means how often AI makes wrong or misleading information.

The hallucination rate of DeepSeek has been much higher than those of its western competitors, making it not too reliable in precision applications, like medical research, finance, and legal analysis.

The problems on issues of factual consistency make DeepSeek contradict itself, though an issue less common with more advanced models such as GPT-4. In most instances, DeepSeek fails to offer data and logically consistent responses all the time.

Its inability in these matters confines its use in business and among researchers that seek reliable AI-generated content and accuracy on the facts presented.

Limited proficiency in the English language

Another significant drawback of DeepSeek is its weaker performance in English. While the model excels in Chinese, its English-language capabilities remain inferior to those of OpenAI’s GPT models.

Users who have tested DeepSeek’s English responses report frequent grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and unclear sentence structures.

This makes the AI less effective for users outside China, as it struggles to maintain coherent, fluent, and professional communication.

Comparative tests on DeepSeek vs ChatGPT have substantiated deep contrasts of how eloquently and smoothly they express their responses.

Outputting well-formatted, natural, and entertaining English, usually a refined production, this is often more characteristic of ChatGPT, while those from DeepSeek sound stiff and wooden.

This weakness makes DeepSeek less so useful for applications that demand writing, such as good-quality output text, for example,

1. Professional Communication: emails, reports, documents

2. Academic writing/research

3. Content Generation: blog articles, articles, marketing copy

4. Customer support chatbots for international companies

AI models must be as fluent in more than one language, but most importantly, in English because it is the international language of business and academics. If DeepSeek’s capabilities to process in English are not improved upon considerably, its success potential on an international scale is nil.

Complex Commands and Reasoning Problems

Another serious disadvantage of DeepSeek is the failure to respond appropriately to complex commands.

Contrary to GPT-4 developed by OpenAI or Google’s Gemini, which can adhere to multi-step instructions well, DeepSeek will mostly misinterpret or fail to complete tasks with more advanced reasoning.

Several reports from users mention that DeepSeek is not great at:

1. Creative writing assignments – The output lacks creative thinking and storytelling capabilities compared to GPT-4.

2. Logical problem solving – The AI tends to commit mistakes in multi-step reasoning exercises, such as mathematics word problems and logic-based puzzle solving.

3. Coding and debugging – On programming-related assignments, DeepSeek is worse than open-source models like Meta’s Llama or Mistral AI in the sense that DeepSeek commits less errors in terms of codes and debugging.

The following limitations make it less prone for professional applications where the AI has to perform without any errors:

The areas are:

• 1. Software development
• 2. Data analysis
• 3. Research and academic work
• 4. Business strategy formulation

Unless the contextual reasoning and complicated job performance is significantly improved, DeepSeek will not be able to dominate the AI champions in the market.

Privacy and Data Security Concerns:

One of the major challenges in the adoption of DeepSeek at a global level is its data handling and privacy policies.

DeepSeek operates according to Chinese data regulations, which are far removed from global standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union.

These issues are particularly crucial for global businesses and consumers who take their data security and privacy seriously. Such issues include the following:

1. The Chinese servers that host the user’s data present concerns on how the government accessed or monitored that data.

2. Data use is a process of lack of transparency; the user does not know how the data is being processed, stored, or shared.

3. Conflicts over compliance – Data policies of DeepSeek are not on par with those of the West, meaning Western privacy laws would be quite a challenge to accept the platform among companies in Europe and North America.

Since its debut, many businesses and companies across the world have discouraged using DeepSeek because sensitive information can be leaked out.

OpenAI and Google follow Western privacy rules to the letter, which are more attractive to businesses with concerns about data security. Until DeepSeek aligns with international standards, it will be less attractive to businesses and individual users in the global market.

Performance Metrics and Competitor Comparison

To get an idea of how DeepSeek performs relative to other AI models, let’s look at the comparison with OpenAI’s GPT-4, Google’s Gemini, and Meta’s Llama.

As seen in the table above, DeepSeek is behind in some of the areas such as English fluency, logical reasoning, and data privacy compliance with global standards.

In all the comparisons, DeepSeek lags behind in creativity content generation, contextual understanding, and problem-solving capabilities.

So, any business seeking AI-driven content creation, customer support, or research tools is likely to opt for competitors like ChatGPT or Gemini instead.

DeepSeek is a very ambitious AI effort. It has, however, had tremendous progress on Chinese language processing.

But there is a large gap in its output accuracy, proficiency in the English language, complexity of the commands, and compliance with the data privacy regulation, making it not a serious competitor in the global AI market.

DeepSeek needs to make the following improvement to become a worthy alternative to ChatGPT and other AI models developed by the West:

• 1. Enhanced fluency in the English language- less grammatical errors.
• 2. Excellent logical reasoning- far more solid multi-step and complex application.
• 3. Less hallucination rate: most answers are more precise and contextual.
• 4. Compliance to global regulations regarding data protection- transparency ensured.

Without such enhancements, DeepSeek will probably remain a regional AI tool rather than truly competing with global corporates.

Potentially it is good, but several salient enhancements are required for the effectual competition at the global level.

Stay Connected and Share Your Stories

For all those inspired by stories of resilience and ambition, follow us on X/Twitter and on Instagram . For those with untold stories that you would love to share, please send them to contact@thephilox.com