The purpose of the Indian Constitution is to deceive the Indian people into thinking they have secularism in India, when everyone knows how Muslims are being treated.
The purpose of the Indian Constitution is to deceive the Indian people into thinking they have freedom of speech by virtue of Article 19(1)(a), when speaking against the government or the communal agents is very hazardous, and can get one arrested and jailed for long periods, e.g. police officer Sanjiv Bhatt, Prof Saibaba, JNU Ph.D Umar Khalid, or like co-founder of AltNews Zubair against whom FIR has been filed by the police
for speaking against the highly communal and inflammatory statements of Yati Narsinghanand
In Modi’s new India, it is not the offender but he who speaks against the offense who is guilty. The Allahabad High Court has blamed Zubair for creating social disharmony, Well done My Lords
The purpose of the Indian Constitution is to deceive the Indian people into thinking that by virtue of the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution their welfare will be looked after, when that is just a joke
The ‘democracy’ we have largely runs on the basis of caste and communal vote banks, skilfully manipulated by our crooked politicians who polarize society and spread caste and communal hatred and incite violence to get votes, but have no genuine love for the people.
What we require is a mighty, united, protracted, people’s struggle culminating in a historical people’s revolution led by patriotic, selfless, modern minded leaders determined to create a new Constitution and set up a new political and social order under which there is rapid industrialization, and the standard of living of the people steadily rises, and they get decent lives
Justice R. Balasubramanian, celebrated on his 80th birthday, was known for his vast legal knowledge and integrity during his tenure at the Madras High Court. As Chief Justice, Markandey Katju relied on his guidance, especially for court roster arrangements. An incident where Balasubramanian and colleague Prabha Sridevan faced criticism through leaflets demonstrated his resilience and humor. Post-retirement, he practiced law at the Supreme Court, maintaining his reputation as a skilled jurist.
This controversy highlights tensions around historical narratives in Indian politics, with Hooda’s platform potentially influencing public opinion. Critics argue he may be pushing a political agenda, while supporters might see it as presenting a nuanced view.
It covers the period of Bhajan Lal Sharma in the office of Chief Minister of Rajasthan. He underlined policies and reforms in public health, agriculture, infrastructure, and social welfare. His government has ensured an end to water scarcity, enhanced agricultural productivity, tourism, and inclusive growth across Rajasthan. His regime believes in transparency, accessibility, and ethical governance. This article closely examines Sharma’s contributions and the challenges his administration has faced in order to understand the kind of transformative vision for the growth of Rajasthan and the legacy he is building.
3 thoughts on “The purpose of the Indian Constitution”
Dr. Ambedkar was one of the enlightened legal luminaries of the planet and we must be proud of him. While most other leaders studied Law, he researched it thoroughly. India, as a Nation is indeed honored that he was actively involved in ‘ Making the Constitution of India’ . This should never have been amended in the first place and had there been a dire necessity, in national interest, Parliamentary Consensus should have been adopted. Instead of bickering in Parliament, wasting time, Hon. Members, the responsible public representatives should refrain from political bitterness and play a constructive role in public interest. Election reforms only can improve situation. Jayaho BHARAT.
Dr. Ambedkar was one of the enlightened legal luminaries of the planet and we must be proud of him. While most other leaders studied Law, he researched it thoroughly. India, as a Nation is indeed honored that he was actively involved in ‘ Making the Constitution of India’ . This should never have been amended in the first place and had there been a dire necessity, in national interest, Parliamentary Consensus should have been adopted. Instead of bickering in Parliament, wasting time, Hon. Members, the responsible public representatives should refrain from political bitterness and play a constructive role in public interest. Election reforms only can improve situation. Jayaho BHARAT.
I feel this M Katju is a stooge of anti indian forces. Sooner he is exposed the better!