Times of India Questions Government's Decision
The latest criticism by The Times of India against the sports ministry decision awarding D. Gukesh Khel Ratna in 2024 is to be based on procedural inflexibility, raising questions over the eligibility criteria and timing of the announcement.
Where compliance with rules is an integral part of sports governance, the book has failed to look at the larger significance of Gukesh’s achievement: the world chess championship at the young age of 18.
This is a moment of deep national and international import and, therefore, cannot be confined to a narrow timeline of eligibility that fits in the box of traditional understanding.
The Achievement in Context: Gukesh’s Historic Feat
D. The victory in December 2024 was a seismic shift in the chess world. It was as if Gukesh was dethroning the very king Magnus Carlsen had ruled over for more than a decade, and for this, Gukesh did the unthinkable.
This is more than the chessboard itself; it shows the new talent that India can produce to represent the country that is making waves on the world sporting map.
This, according to the Times of India and others, happens at a time that doesn’t go along with the four-yearly assessment cycle for the Khel Ratna award, which is generally accepted. Such a viewpoint ignores the nature of what Gukesh has achieved.
Unprecedented performances must be viewed in a fluid light so that extracurricular brilliance is acknowledged whenever they take place. Gukesh’s achievement was not only a personal milestone but a moment of national pride, deserving of immediate recognition.
Procedural Rigidity vs. Sporting Excellence
The article in The Times of India overemphasizes procedural concerns, implying that the decision to honor Gukesh was either politically driven or an emotional impulse.
This narrative undermines the gravity of Gukesh’s accomplishment while suggesting a narrow understanding of the purpose of awards like the Khel Ratna.
These honors are not merely bureaucratic tools but instruments to inspire, reward, and elevate excellence in Indian sports.
Rules are in place to govern things so that they are not one-sided but still leave scope for a couple of exceptions when situations get extreme.
Gukesh is an exception. To not think about the bigger picture and stick to the eligibility criteria strictly would reduce Khel Ratna to merely marking a checkbox from the sporting world, which is quite far removed from its realities.
Chess and the Khel Ratna: Going Beyond the Comparison
Another weak postulate in criticizing the Times of India is making an implicit analogy between chess and Olympic sports. The fact that Olympic achievements fill most of the awards season airwaves creates a narrow-minded bias about the challenges, prestige, or even the greatness associated with playing chess.
This game of chess has long been on the wrong side of a paradigm that privileges feats of the physical world. The victory of Gukesh brings a question mark to this very paradigm and proves that mental sports are no less worthy of honor and accolade than their physical counterparts.
The sports ministry, by awarding Khel Ratna to Gukesh, sends out a very strong message that its recognition criteria are inclusive.
This decision marks an evolving understanding of what constitutes sporting excellence. It recognizes the fact that boundaries of achievement cannot be confined to the traditional categories.
Addressing Allegations of Political Influence
This seems to suggest that the choice was on a political or emotive ground than on a neutral merit consideration as proposed by the Times of India. Such interpretation is both reductionist and dismissive.
It may be that public emotion plays a great role in sports narratives across countries, but such cannot be conflated with being political opportunism. It cannot be regarded as a populist act but an outright acknowledgment of one’s remarkable success.
More than that, the claim that the decision was “emotional” debases the professional acumen of those who were entrusted with the evaluation of Gukesh’s candidature.
The sports ministry, in consultation with experts and stakeholders, would have realized that his achievement was beyond routine milestones and deserved special consideration.
The Gukesh Khel Ratna Debate: A Larger Issue of Adaptive Governance in Sports
This larger issue is debated by the Gukesh Khel Ratna: the need for adaptive governance in sports. For when Indian athletes are constantly breaking ground in different disciplines, the criteria for awards must evolve with these changes.
Flexibility is certainly not a sign of weakness but of responsiveness and foresight. By adapting the rules to honor Gukesh, the sports ministry demonstrates its commitment to celebrating excellence in all its forms, irrespective of timing or traditional norms.
Lessons for Future Recognition
This is a reflection of the challenges that sports governance faces in balancing tradition with innovation. While procedural concerns cannot be brushed aside, they have to be weighed against the imperative to recognize and reward exceptional talent.
Going forward, an even more inclusive and flexible framework for awards such as the Khel Ratna could help avoid such controversies, ensuring that extraordinary achievements are celebrated without unnecessary delays.
A provision for “out-of-cycle” awards may be established, under which truly remarkable achievements are immediately recognized. In this way, the integrity of the awards process will be preserved, but the momentous nature of Gukesh’s triumph will not go unrecognized.
Gukesh’s Legacy
D. Gukesh’s path to becoming the youngest chess world champion is one of perseverance, brilliance, and inspiration.
When it awards the Khel Ratna to him, the sports ministry not only rewards an individual feat but also a far greater aspect-the victory speaks volumes for Indian sport.
When it comes to this, it fails to see how exceptional an accomplishment Gukesh’s was, and the value of the occasion to celebrate.
So finally, awards like the Khel Ratna are about breaking the rules and timelines matter less; rather, they give a chance for recognition and a source of inspiration for greatness.
Honoring Gukesh honors not just the champion but, in fact, a new horizon of possibilities-the excellence that crosses all boundaries has no bounds at all.
Stay Connected and Share Your Stories
For all those inspired by stories of resilience and ambition, follow us on X/Twitter and on Instagram . For those with untold stories that you would love to share, please send them to contact@thephilox.com
3 thoughts on “Times of India Questions Government’s Decision to Award D. Gukesh the Khel Ratna”