Justice katju
A heated controversy is going on in India these days over actor and film maker Anurag Kashyap’s recent remark about Brahmins ( ” I will urinate on Brahmins ” )
This reminds one of the late Periyar’s alleged statement that if you see a Brahmin and a snake, kill the Brahmin first
But what is the truth about the role of Brahmins in Indian society ?
In my blog ‘ The Caste System in India ‘ ( see justicekatju.blogspot.in ) I stated :
” The caste system is one of the greatest social evils plaguing our country today. It is acting as a powerful social obstruction to our progress, and a political divisive force in our country at a time when it is absolutely essential for us to be united if we wish to face our nation’s challenges. It is a curse on our country which must be eradicated if we wish to progress “https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=http://justicekatju.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-caste-system-in-india-this-is-old.html&ved=2ahUKEwi0yNW3k-OMAxUqSGcHHWaQDRwQFnoECFYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2h4OcJwf334eTisdZvJANE
But I also said therein :
” Many people think that the caste system did a lot of damage to India. This is undoubtedly true of modern times. But it must also be said that in the feudal age the caste system did good to India because it corresponded to the feudal occupational division of labour in society , which resulted in the great development of the productive forces (at that time). “
Thus, while the caste system is a totally reactionary and evil institution today, at an earlier stage of our historical development it was progressive and good.
This may sound a contradiction, and so has to be explained.
As stated by the great British economist Adam Smith in his book ‘ The Wealth of Nations ‘, division of labour results in great development of the productive forces in society.
In feudal society, while the primary occupation of most people was agriculture, there was also a handicraft industry, and the caste system contributed to the growth of this. As stated in my blog, every handicraft vocation became a caste e.g. potter, smith, cobbler, textile manufacturer, barber, etc.
But there was also a need of some mental workers ( intellectuals ) in feudal society, and these were the Brahmins.
In feudal society there was no universal education ( as in industrial society ), firstly because there were no resources to provide them, and secondly there was no need to educate everyone, as agriculture and handicraft industry could be carried on by illiterates.
And yet there was need in feudal society for some mental workers too. This was for two reasons.
Firstly, in those days education, which was provided only to Brahmins, was mainly theological, and religion was needed by the ruling class to keep people pacified. People were told that they should accept their fate, since God had so ordained ( hoye wahi jo Ram rakh raakha ). The Brahmins were the custodians of theology, and so they performed this job of keeping people under mental subjugation, using religion for this purpose
Secondly, while feudal society was relatively stable ( as contrasted to industrial society which is dynamic and fast changing ), there was still some progress in it, however slow. For this, intellectuals were required, and these were the Brahmins.
Thus, Brahmins served a dual role in feudal society
The Brahmins, a small minority, were the only educated section of society in feudal times, and the rest of society, even the kings and aristocrats, were broadly illiterates ( with some exceptions ), and their language was Sanskrit This may be compared with the situation in Europe, where the only educated section of society ( with some exceptions ) were the priests, whose language was Latin.
Thus, Brahmins performed a dual role in society. The first was the role of keeping people under mental subjugation ( so that they may not revolt against the oppressive system ), the other being to help society in its progress.
As stated above, division of labour leads to great progress. In feudal society, the Brahmins were a small section of people who were left free to do mental work, the rest of society providing them for their material needs. Without this division of labour progress would have been impossible.
We may compare this with the situation in ancient Greece and Rome. These were societies based on slavery, and slavery in those days played a progressive role, because it left a section of society free to do mental work, their material needs being provided for by slaves.. No doubt the condition of slaves was very bad, but without slavery we would not have had Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Democritus, Pythogaras, Hippocrates, Homer, Aeschylus, Herotodus, Archemides, and the other great men of science and art in ancient times.
Similarly, while the caste system resulted in great oppression of the dalits, etc it also had a positive aspect. Without an intellectual section of society ( the Brahmins ) there would have been no Aryabhat, Brahmagupta, Bhaskar, Varahamihira, Sushrut, Charak, Kalidas, Panini, Patanjali, Vijnaneshwar, Valmiki, Kapila, Gautam, the atheists ( the materialist thinkers, the Charvakas) and the other great Indian philosophers and men of science, art, law, etc. So without Brahmins there would have been no progress in the feudal age in India.
So when we consider the caste system, and in particular the role of Brahmins, we must keep this aspect also in mind. The matter must be considered scientifically, not emotionally
जाति व्यवस्था भ्रमित करती हे व विभाजन की जन्मदाता हे । जाति व्यवस्था महाभारत काल के १०००-१५०० वर्षों के बाद उपजी तबतक चार वर्णों की व्यवस्था रही व सब समानता के अधिकारी थे किसी में कोई पक्षपात व भेदभाव नहीं था यह महाभारत ग्रथं का अध्ययन करने से स्पष्ट हो जाता हे व आर वर्ण से दूसरे वर्ण में जाना बहुत सरल व सम्भव था । जन्म से सब शूद्र ही होते हैं वर्ण व्यवस्था जन्म से व परिवार के अनुसार नहीं थी । ब्राह्मण, क्षत्रिय, वैश्य, शूद्र उनके व्यवसाय ( कर्म) के अनुसार सदैव रही , महाभारत काल के बाद वेदों का अध्ययन लगभग समाप्त हुआ व सबने अपने अपने मत चलाए अपने स्वार्थ/ लालच में व नये नये नियमों का आगमन हुआ मतों/ सम्प्रदाय/ मठों/ मजहब/ रिलीजियन में । अज्ञानता में वर्ण व्यवस्था को जाति बना दिया गया व परिवार व जन्म से जोड़ दिया गया पुर विदेशी आक्रमणकारियों ने इसका अनुचित लाभ लिया जो अभी भी उच्चतम स्तर पर चल रहा हे व ऐक वर्ण वाले दूसरे को गाली दे रहे हैं व अपमान कर रहे हैं व महापुरुषों का अपमान कर रहे हैं यहीं तक नहीं रुके सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म व संस्कृति का अपमान करने से नहीं चूक रहे यह सब स्वार्थ/ लालच/ पद व धन लोलुपता व विदेशी शत्रुओं का प्रभाव यह सब करवा रहा हे । वैदिक संस्कृति के लोग अज्ञानता में व अपने आर्ष ग्रन्थों के अध्ययन न करते हुए वामपंथी/ नास्तिक/ दूसरे मत परस्त हो रहे हैं वही अपनी संस्कृति को अपमानित कर रहे हैं परन्तु फिरभी अपने हिन्दू नामों को नहीं त्यागते क्योंकि उसी के कारण तो लाभान्वित हो रहे हैं । यह अनुराग कश्यप- कश्यप तो ब्राह्मण होते हैं ऋषि कश्यप से आते हैं जब इतनी घृणा हे तब नाम त्यागे वरना सबसे पहले अपने मूत्र स् अपने कान्हा व उसी मूत्र को अपने माता पिता पर डाले ।
वर्ण व्यवस्था का अन्त करके जाति व्यवस्था लाकर अपना स्वयं ने हानिं की हे व बस नयी नयी जातियां बनती जा रही हैं हिन्दुओं में यह सब राजनीतिक दल व विदेशी मज़हबी / रिलीजियन शत्रु कर रहे हैं नये नये टूलकिट इन्ही के ऊपर बन रहे हैं व अपमानजनक वक्तव्य भी इन्हीं जातिवाद पर हो रहे हैं । जातियां आतकिस्लाम ( इस्लाम) मजहब व इसाई मत में भी हे उसके कोई छूने का साहस नहीं करता सब भयभीत होते हैं कारण सब जानते हैं ।
वर्ण व्यवस्था को जाति से भ्रमित न करें व जाति व्यवस्था को समाप्त करना चाहिये व ऐकता व समानता का व्यवहार व व्यवस्था होनी चाहिये जो कि सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म में महाभारत काल तक थी व कभी मतभेद नहीं हुआ । वाल्मीकि रामायण, मनुस्मृति, महाभारत में मिश्रण करके अशुद्ध कर दिया आक्रमणकारीयों ने उसी का अब उदाहरण देते हैं जाति विभाजन व अप्रश्यता – छुआछूत व असमानता का ।